Reference generation
Generate API or CLI documentation from the agreed specification, schema, annotations, or command definitions. Validate the source and review representative output.
Documentation automation - Publish references without repeating the same manual work.
Turn maintained specifications and code into API and CLI references, site builds, or document exports. Your team can review and publish them through the same release workflow.
Selected work
Single-source HTML and PDF publishing
Our data catalog platform case describes a Sphinx and GitHub Actions workflow with HTML and chapter-based PDF generation from maintained sources.
Read the case studyAutomate the steps your team repeats
Publishing pipelines
Build HTML, PDFs, or structured exports for consuming tools through versioned scripts and CI configuration. Output formats and version handling are defined for each workflow.
Integration and handoff
Connect the workflow to your repositories and review process. Document inputs, operation, failure handling, and ownership.
Review suggested updates before they go live
Where appropriate, we configure tools that suggest documentation changes from product changes. Suggestions arrive for human review with the available source context. We evaluate them on representative changes before rollout.
For generated references, we validate the input, reproducibility, and published output. For AI drafts, we review technical accuracy, source support, coverage, and usefulness. Build or style checks alone cannot establish that a draft is correct.
Tool subscriptions, usage costs, integrations, and any ongoing tuning are listed separately in the proposal.
Start with one workflow
Step 1
Map the source and output
Identify the source of truth, change trigger, publishing target, and people who approve technical content.
Step 2
Implement and test
Build the workflow and validate representative changes, failure cases, and the agreed output.
Step 3
Integrate and hand over
Connect the pipeline to review and deployment, then document how your team runs and extends it.
Automation we have implemented
ScyllaDB CLI references
Generation of command-line reference documentation from Python Click definitions using Sphinx.
See ScyllaDB workMONEI API reference
OpenAPI specification processing and custom React components for the Docusaurus API reference.
See MONEI workBlue Robotics language references
Python, C++, and Lua reference-generation workflows for a multi-language documentation system.
See Blue Robotics workVoxel51 documentation exports
Automated exports and documentation infrastructure work on the FiftyOne Sphinx stack.
See Voxel51 workOptions and pricing
Prices below are starting points. Before you commit, you receive a proposal with the work, total cost, schedule, and what we need from your team.
Single-workflow automation
One defined reference-generation or publishing workflow.
From $3,500
- Agreed source and output
- Generation script or configuration
- CI integration and validation checks
- Setup documentation and handoff
Multiple workflows and integrations
Several coordinated workflows or custom scripting across a defined set of systems.
From $8,500
- Named workflows and source systems
- Custom scripting and integrations as scoped
- CI pipelines and representative validation
- Operating documentation and defined support scope
AI-drafted update workflow
A reviewed pilot and rollout for a tool that suggests updates from product changes.
Custom proposal
- Representative changes and evaluation criteria
- Agreed repository and docs-platform connections
- Human approval and quality checks
- Subscription and usage costs identified separately
- Optional tuning agreement with defined capacity
Documentation teams we have worked with
Questions about this service
Generation keeps output aligned with its maintained input. The specification, schema, or code annotations still need ownership and checks to represent the product correctly.
AI suggestions are reviewed by the designated owners before publication. We evaluate accuracy and source support as well as build and style checks.
Subscriptions, usage costs, and ongoing tuning are identified separately in the proposal.
Which documentation step repeats every release?
Share the source, current manual process, and required output. We will identify which step can be automated and how your team will review the result.